Whilst up till this point we have sought to condemn Ibn Taimiyah from his own pen, let us cite some Sunni opinions on the Shiekh ul Islam of the Salafis.
We read in Al-Fatawa al-Hadithya by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, pages 156-157:
ابن تيمية عبد خذله الله وأضله وأعماه وأصمه وأذله ، وبذلك صرح الأئمة الذين بينوا فساد أحواله وكذب أقواله ۔۔۔
IbnTamiyah is a person who has been made infamous, blind, deaf and contemptible and the very fact has also been endorsed by the Imams who have mentioned his being a Fasid and a lair. Whoever wants to know him, should peruse the literature of Imam Hassan bin Subki al-Mujtahid, on whose Imamate, glory, and rank touching the limits of Ijtihad, there is an agreement, and of his son Taj and Shaykh Imam Al-Azz bin Jama and of the scholars amongst the Shafiyees, Malikis and Hanafis of his era. Ibn Tamiyah did not restrict himself to objecting over the later Sufies but he also raised objections against Umar bin al-Khattab and Ali bin Abi Talib. The summary is, that there is no worth of his writing, in fact they should be thrown into a abyss and belief should be held about him that he was an innovator, deviated, ignorant and the one who did Ghlu and may Allah deal with him through His justice and may keep us away from his beliefs and acts, Ameen.
Al-Fatawa al-Hadithya by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, pages 156-157
We read in Al-Dura al-Mudhia, by Ali bin Abdulkafi al-Subki al-Shafiyee (d. 756 H), page 5:
“When Ibn Taimiyah caused what he caused in ideology and abolished the pillars of Islam after which he pretended to be an adherent of the Book and Sunnah, and pretended that he was an advocate for truth and guiding others to heaven, he went astray and (went) towards originating a heresy, and became odd by contradicting the Ijma of Muslims.”
We rean in a book Al-Tawfiq al-Rabani written by a group of Sunni scholars, page 32:
Sheikh Iraqi said … his knowledge exceeded the capabilities of his brain, and he therefore contradicted the ‘Ijma’ of Muslims on many issues. They said on around 60 matters. They therefore criticized and blamed him, and he has been examined due to that. The scholars of his time refuted him, presented his mistakes, and deemed him a heretic. He was also imprisoned due to that.”
We read in Daf Shubah min Shabah by Abu Bakr bin Muhammad al-Hesni al-Dimashqi al-Shafiyee (d. 829 H), page 123:
“Sheikh Zainuddin ibn Rajab al-Hanbali was amongst those that believed that Ibn Taimiyah is a kafir”
On page 90 we read:
“The Imam, the Allamah Sheikh al-Islam of his time Abu al-Hassan Ali bin Ismail al-Qunuwi declared that he was ignorant and didn’t realize what he said. He (Sheikh Qunuwi) stated that he (Ibn Taimiyah) took the belief of ‘Tafriqa’ from his Sheikh who took it from Samirites and Jews, those who pretend to be Muslims.”
On page 125 we read:
“Some scholars deemed him to be an absolute atheist (Zindeeq)”
On page 189 we read:
“We ask Allah to preserve us of what this abhorrent, immoral, liar performs.”
We also read:
“The result of the case was the atheism of him (Ibn Taimiyah) because he dares to attribute lies to the scholars and did not ascribe to any prohibition on telling lies.”
We read in Tathir al-Fuad by Sheikh Muhammad Bekhit al-Mut’aei al-Hanafi (d. 1350 H), page 9:
From the second group are those whose hearts Allah (swt) darkened, and the people of heresy seal up their hearts in beliefs that contradict the book, sunnah and ‘ijma’. They therefore went astray and misguided many people, may Allah’s curse be on them: how deluded are they from the truth! Their ultimate abode shall be hell, a hapless journey’s end.
Verily the Muslims were tested considerably by this group, they are a mark of disgrace for the Muslims and the infected part must be removed to prevent others from being harmed, verily it is like a lesprosy from which one must away, and ibn Taimiyah is one of them.”
We read in Shawahed al-Haq by Shakyh Yusuf al-Nabhani, page 191:
“Its proven (as clear) as the midday sun in the sky that the Ulema of the four (Sunni) schools agreed on rejecting the heresies of Ibn Taimiyah, and some of them criticized his honesty in narrating. They also criticized the stability of his brain”
We read in Furqan al-Quran by Salamah al-Azami al-Qadaei al-Shafiyee (d. 1376 H), page 132:
“The strange thing about this man is that whenever he produced a heresy, he lied and claimed that there is ‘Ijma’ on this from the previous and modern (scholars); and you might find him contradicting himself on the same page.”
We read in Sayf al-Jabar al-Maslool by Shah Fadhl al-Qadri al-Hindi, page 42:
“The wretched ibn Taimiyah. There is an ‘ijma’ by the scholars of his time on his deviation from the right path”
We read in Fadhl al-Dhakerin by Abdulghani Hamada, page 23:
The Allamah of his time Alauddin al-Bukhari said about their Sheikh Ibn Taimiyah: ‘Ibn Taimiyah is a kafir’.
Abu al-Mahasin al-Dimashqi in his book Zayl Tazkirah tul Hufaz, page 316 and Shaykh Ahmed Raza Bijnawri in Anwar al-Bari, Volume 11 page 192 have recorded another statement of Shaykh Alauddin Bukhari al-Hanafi (d. 841 H) regarding Ibn Tamiyah that:
“He (Alauddin Bukhari) declared in his assembly that whoever deems Ibn Taymia to be ‘Sheikh ul Islam’ is kafir”.
We read in Takmilat al-Sayf al-Saqil by Muhammad Zahed bin Hassan al-Kawthari al-Hanafi (d. 1371 H), page 177:
“The Syrian (scholars) issued a statement about ibn Taimiyah, and al-Burhan ibn al-Ferkah wrote on it forty lines wherein he declared that he (ibn Taimiyah) is a kafir, and al-Shehab bin Jabhal agreed with him”
We read in Al-Durar al-Kamina by ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Volume 1 page 46:
“The Shafiyye judge returned back to his position and declared in Damascus that whoever ascribed to Ibn Taimiyah’s beliefs should have his blood shed”
We also read in Al-Durar al-Kamina, Volume 1 page 49:
“Ibn Taimiyah was released in Shaam. The people had different views of him. Some of them deemed him as one that considered the likeness of Allah to His creature, due to what he said in ‘Aqeeda al-Hamawiya’ and ‘Wasitiya’ and other (books), such as the hand, foot, leg and face are real attributes of Allah, and He is sitting on the throne by Himself. Then it was said to him (Ibn Taimiyah) that the necessities of these beliefs constitute ascribing to the limitation and partition (of Allah), he (Ibn Taimiyah) replied: ‘I don’t believe that limitation and partition is an attribute of a body.’
Others deemed him as one that concealed unbelief due to his saying that the Prophet is not to be sought for help (laa yustaghaathu bihi) and the fact that this amounted to diminishing and impeding the establishing of the greatness of the Prophet. Amongst the most rigid people against him was al-Noor al-Bakri, and he established a council due to that. Some of the members said: ‘We shall pardon him (Ibn Taimiya)’. He (al-Bakri) replied: ‘There is no meaning in that statement. If he was diminishing he must be killed. If he wasn’t diminishing he will not be pardoned’.
Others considered him a hypocrite because of what he said about Ali:… that he had been forsaken (makhdhoolan) everywhere he went, had repeatedly tried to acquire the Caliphate and never attained it, fought out of lust for power rather than religion, and said that “he loved authority while Uthman loved money.” He would say that Abu Bakr had declared Islam in his old age, fully aware of what he said, while Ali had declared Islam as a boy, and that a boy’s Islam is not considered sound upon his mere words. And due to his statement about the story of his proposing to the daughter of Abu Jahl and what he attributed the praises to…Also the story of Abi al-Aas bin al-Rabee and what can be concluded from its concept. In totality, he said derogatory things such as these, and it was said against him that he was a hypocrite, in view of the Prophet’s saying (to Ali): “Only a hypocrite would show you hatred.”
Others deemed him a power seeker due to his praising ibn Tumart and constant mention of him.”
The four sunni scholars of the four Sunni sects composed a decree to imprison ibn Taimiyah due to his straying from the right path. The four scholars were:
Sunni References:
1. Takmilat al-Sayf al-Saqil, by Zahid al-Kawthari, page 177
2. Daf Shubah men Shabah, by al-Hesni al-Demashqi, page 97
3. Al-Tawfiq al-Rabani, by group of Sunni scholars, page 21
4. Al-Nabrah Sharah Sharah al-Aqaid page 114 Colmun 4 (published in Meerut)
5. Sharah Aqaid Jalali, page 80 (published in Afghanistan)
Shaykh Syed Ahmad Raza Bijnawri has recorded the statements of his teacher Imam Anwar Shah Kashmiri in a book ‘Anwar al-Bari Sharah Sahih Bukhari’ which has been published by Idara Talifiat Asharfiyah, Multan, Pakistan. On Volume 6 pages 221-222, there is a caption ‘The authentication of Hadith Rad al-Shams by Imam Tahawi and its criticism by Hafiz Ibn Taimiyah’ under which he stated:
“Ibn Taimiyah’s point of view represents Khariji tendencies”
In Volume 11 page 119 of Anwar al-Bari, we also read that eighteen scholars of Egypt having Qazi Taqiuddin Muhammad bin Abi Bakar Akhnai Maliki as the leader gave an edict of Kufr of Ibn Taimiyah on the basis that he (Ibn Taimiyah) used to forbid people from traveling for the pilgrimage of the graves of prophets particularly of Holy Prophet (s). The scholars deemed it an act of blasphemy against the prophets, which was equal to Kufr and hence its punishment was execution.
Imam of Ahle Sunnah Shah Abdul Aziz Muhadith Dehalwi stated:
“At times, the text of Ibn Tamiyah in books such as ‘Minhaaj as Sunnah’ and others has been very hideous, it has been very belittling particularly against Ahlulbayt, prohibits visiting the tomb of Rasulullah (s), rejects the Ghauth, Qutub and Abdaal and disgrace the Sufies… According to the views of Ahlul Sunnah, his text is cursed therefore AhlulSunnah can not be criticized because of his writings”.
Fatawa Azizi, Volume 2 page 79 (Published in Deoband)
Below is a list of those Sunni scholars that opposed ibn Taimiyah: