The post modern Nawasib are the staunch adherents of the grand enemies of Ahlulbayt (as) and they will remain so until the time of the appearance of their Imam Sufiyani and our Imam Mahdi (as). It is tragic that rather repent and mend their ways, they have persisted with the deceitful traits inherited from their elders and dedicated the efforts to contaminating the Shia view of Imam Mahdi (as) by misinterpreting Shia texts and presenting such distortion to their ignorant readers as proof that it is the Shia and not they, who shall be the followers of Dajjal. In this chapter, we shall counter all such attempts by the Nawasib of www.allaahuakbar.net and expose the true followers of the opponent leader of Imam Mahdi (as) i.e. Sufiyani. Whilst exposing this reality we would ask readers to keep in their minds that according to the Shia belief, Dajjal is not a person but a symbol (s) of evil, it would hence be incorrect to believe that Dajjal (the signs of evil) represents the would-be Imam of Nawasib i.e. Sufiyani.
Nawasib of www.allaahuakbar.net stated:
1)Mahdi of the Rawafidees will rule according to the Laws of David and the family of David:
Al-Kulyani reports in his work al-Kafi, volume no.1, p.397-398:
a)Narrated Ali ibn Ibraheem -from his father-from ibn Abi Umair-from Mansour-from Fadhl al Aour-from Abi Ubaidah who reported: “During the times of Imam Jaffar[as] we used to go around like herds without a caretaker. We met with Salim ibn Abi Hafs who asked me: ”Oh Abu Ubaidullah, who is your Imam?” I replied:” My Imams are from the household of the prophet”. He then stated: “You have perished and so have I for both of us have heared Abu Jafar[as] saying: “One who dies without recognizing his Imam, he dies a death of Jahiliyyah.” Then I affirmed what he said. It was before that three or somewhat close to it(time span) when I entered upon Abu Abdullah[as] and God granted me knowledge. Then I said to Abu Abdullah[as]: “Salim said such and such.” He replied: “Oh Abu Obaidah nobody here will die until he is succeeded by some one who does the same thing as his, and adopts the similar manners of his predecessor, and calls to the same thing as his predecessor did. Oh Abu Ubaidah, it was permitted that whatever was given to David was also provided for Sulaiman.” Then he added: “Oh Abu Ubaidah when the Qaem of the household of the prophet appears, he will rule according to rule of David and Solomon.”
b) Muhammad ibn Yahya-Ahmad ibn Muhammad-Muhammad ibn Sinaan-Abaan who reported: “I heard Abu Abdullah[as] saying: “The world will not fade away unless a person from us appears who will rule according to the rule of the family of David and he will not ask his house. He will give every one his right.
c) Ahmad–Ahmad ibn Muhammad–Ibn Mahboob–Hisham ibn Salim–Ammar as Saabati who reported: “I asked Abu Abdullah [as] : “On what will you rule if you are made the rulers.” He replied: “By the rule of Allah and the rule of David. And if we are confronted by a situation which we cannot solve, Gabriel (Ruh al Quds) will reveal it to us.”
d) Muhammad ibn Ahmad–Muhammad ibn Khalid–Nazr ibn Suwaid–Yahya al Halabi–Imran ibn Oueiyn–Jaeed al Hamdani–Ali ibn al-Hussein[as] said: “I asked him by which law will you rule?” He said: “By the rule of David, and if there is something which we are unaware of, Gabriel(Ruh al Quds) will reveal it to us.”
e) Ahmad ibn Mahran(ra)–Muhammad ibn Ali–Ibn Mahboob–Hishaam bin Salim–Ammar as Saabati reported: I asked Imam Abu Abdullah[as] :“What is the status of the Aimmah.” He replied : “It is similar to the status of Dhul Qarnain, Ushegh, and Asef the companion of prophet Sulaiman.” Then I asked: “By what will you rule?” He replied: “By the rule of God, by the rule of David, and by the rule of the Prophet Muhammad[saw] and by the revealation of Gabriel.
Since the filthy Nawasib are fully aware that they shall be the followers of the Sufiyani, an adherent of Muawiyah, they have sought to adopt the inherited traits of deceit in order to pollute the Shia view of Ahlulbayt (as). They cite the above traditions before their naive and some ignorant masses to prove that according to the Shia, Imam Mahdi (as) will not rule according to Sharia of Prophet Muhammad (s) but according to the Sharia of David (as) and hence the Mahdi (as) will be the Dajjal (naudobillah). Unfortunately these children of Muawiyah:
Had these Nasibis adopted honesty, they would have never been able to achieve their nefarious objective of maligning Imam Mahdi (as), who shall uproot the filth of the would-be Nasibi Imam Dajjal. The chapter from which the above cited traditions have been quoted from Al-Kafi is:
When the Imams will Rise with Divine Authority They will Judge Among People as David and his People had Done that They will not Ask any Witness to Testify (May the peace and blessings of Allah be up on them).
Al-Kafi, Volume 1 Part 4 chapter 99
The chapter name shall suffice to show the dishonesty of the Nawasib since we believe that Imam Mahdi (as) being the true successor of Prophetic knowledge will not need witnesses to determine the truth but the knowledge granted to him by Allah (swt) shall suffice for Him (as) to decide matters and spread justice amongst the people, this replicated the method that was previously utilised by David (as) who would not use witnesses to rule upon matters, but would access the divine knowledge granted to him by Allah (swt). Imam Mahdi (as) who is the final authority of Allah (swt) on this earth has a special era of rule in contrast to all of the other representatives of Allah (swt) that have set foot on the earth because being as this is the last era of earth, Allah (swt) will make Islam prevail across the globe through Him (as) and a major tool to enable this process shall be the availability of justice to each and every individual as we read in Prophetic traditions:
“Even if the entire duration of the world’s existence has already been exhausted and only one day is left (before the day of judgment), Allah will expand that day to such a length of time, as to accommodate the kingdom of a person from my Ahlul-Bayt who will be called by my name. He will fill out the earth with peace and justice as it will have been full of injustice and tyranny (by then) .”
Since one of the key tasks linked to Imam Mahdi’s (as) special era shall be the provision of justice a special method will be used, namely the precedent set by David’s (as) relating to the method of providing justice. Imam Mahdi (as) the final representative of Allah (swt) shall therefore rule according to:
We know from the stories of Prophet Solomon (as) that He would pass judgments in cases without seeking reliance upon witnesses due to the knowledge given to him by Allah (SWT). We shall now cite the hadith in question and another from the same chapter that shall prove that Imam (as) shall pass judgments according to the laws of Allah (swt) brought by Prophet Muhammad (s) .
Muhammad ibn Yahya has narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from Muhammad ibn Sinan from Aban from abu ‘Abdallah (a.s.) who has said the following. “The world will not end before the rise of a man from us who would judge among people the way the family of David had been judging them. He will not ask any witness to testify. He will make every soul’s rights available to it.”
al-Kafi, Volume 1, Part 4, Chapter 99, hadith 2
In another hadith it says:
“….when Al-Qaim (the one who will rise) will rise he will judge among people the way David and Solomon had been judging among people. He will not call any witness to testify in a case.”
al-Kafi, Volume 1, Part 4, Chapter 99, hadith 1
Note that in both above hadith it says “the way” and not that “they will rule in accordance with the ruling of the prophet David” as the Nawasib have suggested, and this exposes their deception. In another hadith it states clearly that this will be for special cases.
He said, “We judge by the laws of Allah and in the manner of David. If a case would come before us to which there is no lead with us,……..”
al-Kafi, Volume 1, Part 4, Chapter 99, hadith 3
All of the hadiths clearly state that the Imam (as) will judge amongst people in the way that David (as) and Solomon (as) did namely by deciding matters via the knowledge given by Allah (swt) that made the concept of witness testimony redundant. The Hadith does not say that His judgments shall be according to the Sharia of David or Solomon. We have the story of Prophet Solomon (as) that had to decide who amongst two women was the mother of a baby. Solomon (as) stated that the matter be resolved by slicing the child in two, with each claimant getting half the child. When one woman said she would rather give up her claim than have the child killed, it was determined that she was the real mother. There were no witnesses in this case but through knowledge and logic bestowed on him, Prophet Solomon (as) was able to judge between them rightly. Apart from David (as) and Solomon (as), Khidr (as) was also granted knowledge by Allah (swt) which he would decide matters, what clear example can be than that cited in the Quran when Khidr (as) killed a child on the basis of the knowledge granted to him by Allah (swt).
Nawasib of www.allaahuakbar.net stated:
2) Mahdi Al-Muntazar will speak in Hebrew:
Reported to us Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Saeed al Uqdah who said: Narrated to us Ali ibn al-Hasan at-Taymali who said: narrated to us al-Hasan and Muhammad the sons of Ali ibnu Yusuf, from Sa’daan ibnu Muslim, from rajaal, from alMufadhaal ibn Umar who said:
Abu Abdullah[as] reported: “When the Imam Mahdi calls out, he will supplicate to God in Hebrew.”[ Shiite source: Al-Ghaybaa of an Numani, p.326]
What can we say about the level of narrow-mindedness possessed by Nawasib! Just because they have been deprived of eligible leaders and that too because of their own choice, they make it a point to criticize someone’s leader that posseses various positive capabilities. We the Shias of Ahlulbayt (as) believe that Allah (swt) is Aadil (just) and thus one of the main tasks of His (swt) representatives is to spread justice amongst the masses that comprise of different castes, races and nations. To enable this, the leader must be equipped with the ability to convince others that can never be the case until he is well versed in the language that his subjects understand. This is common sense as well as everyday practice. Why do the diplomats of different countries learn the languages of the countries wherein they are dispatched? They do so to pave the way for the smooth transfer of ideas and knowledge. This is not something unique nor is it a modern concept, we see that Holy Prophet (s) also ordered His companions to learn the languages of the people belonging to different religions/nations including Hebrew. Shall we conclude that the Prophet (s) was asking his companions to become Jews? Just because Nawasib have got access to the above cited Shia tradition according to which Imam Mahdi (as) will be familiar with Hebrew (too), does that mean that He (s) will actually be the anti-Christ (naudobillah)?
We read the following tradition in Sunan Abi Dawood, Book 25, Number 3638 which has been declared as ‘Hasan’ by the Imam of Salafies Nasiruddin Albaani in his book Sahih Abu Dawoud, Volume 2 page 694:
Narrated Zayd ibn Thabit:
The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) ordered me (to learn the writing of the Jews), so I learnt for him the writing of the Jews. He said: I swear by Allah, I do not trust Jews in respect of writing for me. So I learnt it, and only a fortnight passed that. I mastered it. I would write for him when he wrote (to them), and read to him when something was written to him.
Sunni Sheikh Saeed Laham in the footnote of this tradition wrote:
“To learn the writing of Jews: Means to learn the Hebrew language and Torah”
The Imams of Ahlulbayt (as) from Imam Ali bin Abi Talib (as) through to Imam Mahdi (as) as the inheritors of Prophetic knowledge and the true caliphs of Allah (swt) on this earth are not only be familiar with Hebrew but are also well versed in every language that has been spoken by people upon this earth. Thus, the stupid Nawasib cannot just pick and chose what suits them and overlook the rest of the facts. For example we read in Usool al-Kafi, Volume 1 page 462 Hadith 5 about Imam Hassan (as):
Abi Abdullah (as) said that al-Hassan (as) said: “…and I know all the languages…”
Shaykh Majlesi declared it Sahih in Mirat al-Uqool, Volume 5 page 357
Shaykh al-Mufid records in Al-Ikhtesas, page 289:
“The Imams (as) know all the languages and accents”
We read in ‘Min Wahi al-Islam’ by Hassan Tarad, page 270:
“As each of the Imams was the most knowledgeable person of his time in all the fields of knowledge, they were also aware of all the languages of their time, and would hence talk to every person in his (respective) language.”
Similarly we read about Imam Mahdi (as) that:
“The people of the earth, every one will hear Him in his own language”
Al-Irshad by Shaykh Mufid, Volume 2 page 369
Whilst the above facts should suffice as a response, we should also highlight a weakness in the traditions chain of narration (cited by the Nawasib) since the name of a narrator in between Sheikh Mufid and al-Mufadhal bin Umar is missing and to have a connected chain, there should be five people in between these two which is not the case here.
Nawasib of www.allaahuakbar.net stated:
3)The Jews will be the followers of Imam Mahdi:
Sheikh alMufeed has reported in his Al-Irshaad from alMufadhaal ibnu Umar that Imam Abu Abdullah[as] has reported: “There will appear along with Imam Mahdi in Kufa, 27 people from the tribe of Moses, and seven from the people of the cave, and Yushegh ibn Nun, and Sulaiman, and Abu Dujjana al-Ansari, and Miqdad, and Malik Usthur who all be his(imam Mahdi’s helpers).” [Al-Irshaad of al-mufeed at Tusi p.402]
When will these Nasibis abandon there deceptive traits? Since the Nasibi author has deliberately manipulated the words in this tradition allow us to present the original Arabic text of the tradition along with its correct English translation:
from al-Mufadhal ibn Umar that Imam Abu Abdullah (as) has reported: The Qaim (as) will appear from the vicinity of Kufa with twenty seven (27) men, fifteen (15) of whom will be from among the people of prophet Moses (as), those who guide to truth and judge with justice, Seven (7) will be the inhabitants of the cave (al-Kahf),Yusha son of Nun, Solomon, the father of Dajjanah al-Ansari, al-Miqdad, and Malik al-Ashtar, they will be sanctioned as assistants and governors in His (as) presence.
Why did the Nasibi author feel the need to delete the original words and present the people being referred to in the tradition as Jews? The tradition is clear that whilst these individuals shall be from the tribe of Musa (as), those fifteen people will be the guided to truth and shall act as just judges that means Muslims. Where did the filthy author bring the word ‘Jews’ from? It is indeed unfortunate that the Nasibi author has tried to present these just judges as Jews and cunningly spared the corrupt judge that abandoned all aspects of justice when ruling upon the inheritance rights of the daughter of the Holy Prophet (s)!
The najis Nasibi author in his article continues with his lies and in his efforts to prove that the Shia Imam Mahdi (as) shall be the Dajjal (naudobillah) he states:
—The Prophet (saw) said, “To every Ummah there is a magian and the magian of this ummah are those who reject the Qadr or predestination. If anyone amongst them dies do not attend their funeral, and if anyone amongst them becomes sick don’t visit them AND THEY ARE SHIATUL DAJJAAL OR PARTISANS OF THE DAJJAL and it is the right of God to join them with the Dajjaal (Sunan Abi Dawoud #4072)
So the Shiites are the magians of this ummah and their Iranian nation. Khomeini has clearly stated that he rejected predestination( Tahreer al-Waseela vol.1, p.79)
It is amazing that the Nasibi author has sought to attack the Shia through reliance on a weak tradition, that he places under the heading of “Authentic Ahaadeeth of the Prophet about the Dajjaal” . Imam of Salafies Nasiruddin Albaani has clearly declared it weak:
Daeef Sunan Abi Dawood, page 466 H1010
Ever since their first leader lied in order to snatch the right of Ahlulbayt (as), Nasibis have believed that the incident set a precedent whereby they could use lies to ‘refute’ the arguments of the people of truth. Having lied about the authenticity of tradition, the deceitful author has again lied about the Shia belief of Qadha and Qadar so as to suggest that the tradition refers to the Shias of Ahulbayt (as). Whilst there is ample material available on the actual Shia belief about Qadha and Qadar we shall mention the following link form where one can read about the actual Shia belief in this regard:
http://www.ghadeer.org/english/shia/imamia/02.htm#10
Also one can notice how childish the author has been to just jump onto the Iranian nation while nothing of the sort is mentioned in the tradition used by him. Moreover, the pathetic author has failed to cite the actual wordings of Ayatullah Khomeni from Tahreer al-Waseela, Volume 1 page 79 which according to the author’s claim contain Khomeni’s rejection of predestination and how could the Nasibi author has presented the words since nothing of the sort is written in the cited page:
http://www.yasoob.com/books/htm1/m001/05/no0597.html
On the contrary, Ayatullah Khomeni writes in his book Lub al-Athar, page 293:
The Qadha (predetermination) and Qadar (divine decree) is amongst the beliefs which the book (Quran) and Sunnah proved, therefore no one has the right to deny any either of these.
It is also strange that the Nasibi author shamelessly attributed a belief to the Shia of Ahlulbayt (as) to attribute a weak tradition to them, but in this endeavor he forgot that it was his Nasibi ancestors that rejected Qadar, one such example is that of Thawr bin Yazeed who was one of the Sunni Muhaditheen and Scholars (Siar alam alnubala, v6, p344) about whom we read:
“He is Thiqa in Hadeeth. It is said that he was a rejecter of Qadar. He died in 152 H in Bait al Muqaddas during the era of Abu Jaffar over the age of 60. The grandfather of Thawr was present in Siffeen and participated alongwith Muawiyah and was killed in the same war. Therefore whenever the name of Ali was taken before Thawr he used to say: “I do not love the man who killed my grandfather۔”
Tabaqat Ibn Saad, Vol 7 under the topic of Thawr bin Yazid al Kalayee
And since the Nasibi had the audacity to lie about the Shia belief of Qadha and Qadar, we shall present the Kufr belief of Nawasib pertaining to the belief of Qadha and Qadar from Musnad Abu Hanifa, page 152:
“Iman is to believe in Allah, His angels, His books, His messengers, Qadr, the good and the evil is all from Allah”
Musnad Abu Hanifa, page 152
Prior to this tradition, the Nasibi author also cited this Sunni tradition:
Authentic Ahaadeeth of the Prophet about the Dajjaal
—The Prophet (saw) said that the Dajjaal will descend in Marqand …….then Allah will grant the Muslims victory on him who will kill him and his SHIA in so much that when the Jew hides behind a tree or a stone, then the tree and the stone will say to the Muslim that there is a Jew behind me come and kill him, (Musnad Imam Ahmad #5099)
the question arises here: Why didnt the prophet not say “Itib’aa” or followers instead of “SHIA” or partisans? they were actually called rawafids in the past but now they are called Shiites, and the Prophet doesn’t speak of his own!
Just like before, whilst using the the heading of “Authentic Ahaadeeth of the Prophet about the Dajjaal” the Nasibi author has lied since Shaykh Shoib al-Arnaut in the margin of this tradition has clearly declared it to be a weak tradition:
Musnad Ahmed bin Hanbal, Volume 2 page 67 Tradition 5353
As for author’s absurd discussion on the word ‘Shiat’ being used in the tradition, he has unnecessarily sought to create a perception that the word ‘Shiat would always refer to the Imamiyah sect which is briefly known as ‘Shia’ while the actual sense of using the word ‘Shia’ for Imamiyah sect is ‘Shia (followers) of Ali (as)’. Since the weak tradition used by the Nasibi author doesn’t mention the ‘Shia (followers) of Ali (as)’ rather taks about the ‘Shia (followers) of Dajjal’ it would have been better for the pathetic author to have refrained from making fools of his readership. The word Shia (followers) has been used in Islamic history to refer to the Shias (followers) of Uthman, Muawiyah, Yazeed etc. in fact, according to al Muhadith Shah Abdul Aziz Dehalwi, the present day Sunnies were known as Shias but then they chose a different name. In the end let us relate this topic to the final sentence of the Nasibi author i.e. “the Prophet doesn’t speak of his own desire” by presenting the following tradition:
“Holy Prophet (s) said to Ali (as): “O Ali! You will come in front of Allah. And your Shia will be pleased and liked (favorite) and your enemies will be tied up in front on him in anger.” And then Ali placed his hands behind his head on his neck to demonstrate in the manner his enemies will be tied up.”
Sawaiq al Muhirqah, page 519 (published in Faisalabad, Pakistan)
Nawasib of www.allaahuakbar.net stated:
—the Prophet (saw) has stated : “The Dajjaal will be followed by 70,000 Jews of Isfahan, having on themselves persian shawls.” [Sahih Muslim #5227]
Question: What makes the Dajjaal to go to Isfahan as it is a Shiite land and why is the involvement of the Jews in a Shiite city? Is this a coincidence?
First of all the Sunni source is of no use for us and since we have made it clear that according to the Shia view, Dajjal will not be a person but be a symbol of evil the tradition further looses its importance and cannot be interpreted in the manner in which the Nasibi author has done. Despite this, allow us for the sake of discussion, the unveil the absurd logic the author has sought to use with this tradition.
The largest Jewish community in the Middle East is in Iran, dating back to 600 BC. The present day Iranian Jews are the second largest Jewish community after Israel. In the past, Iran was a Sunni country, so if we apply the pathetic logic of the Nasibi author, does that means that had Dajjal appeared during the Sunni reign, most of his followers would have been Sunnies?
It is logical that if the Dajjal appears his adherents shall come from those countries with a large concentration of Jew. We should also point out that Asfahan is a multi faith city wherein there are Shias, Sunnis, Ismailis, Sufis, Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians.
Having refuted all the absurd attempts by the Nawasib to malign the character of Imam Mahdi (as), let us now unveil the relationship that our opponents are going to have with the Dajjal and Sufiyani. Before we go any further, we would like to mention that if a Sunni or a Nasibi is asked whether he loves Uthman bin Affan, his answer is obviously going to be affirmative but if someone asks the same question to a Shia, the answer will be negative. This means the Ahle Sunnah are the proud followers and lovers of Uthman. Now who will be the follower of Dajjal be according to Sunnies themselves? Its answer is that:
“When Dajjal appears, his followers will be the lovers of Uthman”
Mizan al-Eitadal, Volume 2 page 107 Translation No. 3031
Sunni scholar Yaqub Fasawi sought to cast doubts over the authenticity of the chain of narration in this tradition which incensed the grand Sunni Imam Dhahabi who stated:
“That is what al-Fasawi rejected from the hadiths, no one did so before him, and if we follow such scruples we would be rejecting many correct Sunnah just because of wrong illusions”
Not only Dajjal but Sufiyani will also be a staunch Uthmani/Nasibi as recorded by Imam Qurtubi:
“He shall address the people of Damishq: ‘O people of Damishq, I am from you and you people are special to us. My grandfather was Muawiyah bin Abi Sufiyan.”
Tazkirah Qurtubi, page 693
Sufiyani being from the filthy progeny of Muawiyah and Dajjal’s followers being the lovers of Uthman it is no surprise that these two entities shall come into conflict with the followers of the Ahlubayt (as) and this continue to be the case until their Imam Sufiyani appears and is defeated by the final Imam from Ahlulbayt (as).